<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 464 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107679</link>
    <description>Small scale exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. is barred only where another person&#039;s brand name is used on goods that are the same as those manufactured by that person. On the facts found by the Commissioner, the assessee&#039;s goods were different from the brand owner&#039;s goods, and no material showed that this finding was or erroneous. The bar against use of another&#039;s brand name therefore did not apply, and the assessee was entitled to the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:46:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 464 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107679</link>
      <description>Small scale exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. is barred only where another person&#039;s brand name is used on goods that are the same as those manufactured by that person. On the facts found by the Commissioner, the assessee&#039;s goods were different from the brand owner&#039;s goods, and no material showed that this finding was or erroneous. The bar against use of another&#039;s brand name therefore did not apply, and the assessee was entitled to the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>