<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 743 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107674</link>
    <description>A declarant SSI unit covered by Notification No. 1/93 and not required to maintain full statutory records was not liable to confiscation or penalty for non-entry of rubber compound sheets and stearic acid, since the goods had not reached RG-1 stage and no contravention attracting Rule 226 was established. The alleged duty demand and confiscation relating to rubber rings and rail pads said to have been cleared to a fictitious buyer also failed, because the Department&#039;s evidence of clandestine manufacture and removal was weak and uncorroborated. The demand under Section 11A and the connected penal action were therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:31:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 743 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107674</link>
      <description>A declarant SSI unit covered by Notification No. 1/93 and not required to maintain full statutory records was not liable to confiscation or penalty for non-entry of rubber compound sheets and stearic acid, since the goods had not reached RG-1 stage and no contravention attracting Rule 226 was established. The alleged duty demand and confiscation relating to rubber rings and rail pads said to have been cleared to a fictitious buyer also failed, because the Department&#039;s evidence of clandestine manufacture and removal was weak and uncorroborated. The demand under Section 11A and the connected penal action were therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>