https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107653 Refund adjustment against an existing, unstayed central excise duty demand was treated as lawful when the adjustment order was passed, because the demand had then been confirmed and no stay barred recovery. The later setting aside of that demand did not retrospectively invalidate the earlier adjustment. The challenge to the adjustment therefore failed, and the refund set-off against the then-outstanding duty liability remained undisturbed. en-us Mon, 21 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Mar 2012 11:09:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107653 Refund adjustment against an existing, unstayed central excise duty demand was treated as lawful when the adjustment order was passed, because the demand had then been confirmed and no stay barred recovery. The later setting aside of that demand did not retrospectively invalidate the earlier adjustment. The challenge to the adjustment therefore failed, and the refund set-off against the then-outstanding duty liability remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107653