<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 364 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107650</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the duty on cut flowers produced in an EOU and removed to DTA is governed by the Central Excise Act, not the Customs Act. The duty payable is as per the proviso to Section 3 of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal allowed waiver of pre-deposit, and the case is scheduled for a hearing on 18th September 2003.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 11:01:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 364 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107650</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the duty on cut flowers produced in an EOU and removed to DTA is governed by the Central Excise Act, not the Customs Act. The duty payable is as per the proviso to Section 3 of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal allowed waiver of pre-deposit, and the case is scheduled for a hearing on 18th September 2003.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>