https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107625 A tribunal's operative direction for release of imported goods remained binding in the absence of any stay from a higher court, so Customs could not withhold compliance merely because an appeal might be filed. The Tribunal held that its earlier order granting consequential reliefs had to be implemented immediately and used its ancillary procedural power under Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 to secure obedience. It directed release of the goods within three days and required reporting of compliance within a fixed time, while noting that deliberate non-implementation could attract contempt action. en-us Wed, 02 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:04:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107625 A tribunal's operative direction for release of imported goods remained binding in the absence of any stay from a higher court, so Customs could not withhold compliance merely because an appeal might be filed. The Tribunal held that its earlier order granting consequential reliefs had to be implemented immediately and used its ancillary procedural power under Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 to secure obedience. It directed release of the goods within three days and required reporting of compliance within a fixed time, while noting that deliberate non-implementation could attract contempt action. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 02 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107625