<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 277 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107613</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled that the processes conducted by the appellant on synthetic diamond powder do not amount to manufacturing. The Tribunal found that the processes aimed at removing impurities rather than fundamentally altering the product, leading to the conclusion that no new product with distinct characteristics emerged. As a result, penalties on the appellant and its associates were not warranted, emphasizing that the processes focused on enhancing the powder&#039;s cutting function without changing its essential nature or use.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 277 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107613</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled that the processes conducted by the appellant on synthetic diamond powder do not amount to manufacturing. The Tribunal found that the processes aimed at removing impurities rather than fundamentally altering the product, leading to the conclusion that no new product with distinct characteristics emerged. As a result, penalties on the appellant and its associates were not warranted, emphasizing that the processes focused on enhancing the powder&#039;s cutting function without changing its essential nature or use.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>