<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 255 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107591</link>
    <description>Delay in filing an appeal may be condoned where the appellant shows sufficient cause, including pursuit of settlement proceedings that explains the late filing. On that basis, the Tribunal condoned the delay and allowed the condonation application; the separate stay request became infructuous because the interest amount had not yet been quantified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:51:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 255 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107591</link>
      <description>Delay in filing an appeal may be condoned where the appellant shows sufficient cause, including pursuit of settlement proceedings that explains the late filing. On that basis, the Tribunal condoned the delay and allowed the condonation application; the separate stay request became infructuous because the interest amount had not yet been quantified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>