<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 247 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107583</link>
    <description>Suspension of a Customs House Agent licence was held unsustainable where the alleged irregularity in clearance was attributed to an employee acting in a personal capacity, without the firm&#039;s knowledge or involvement. The Department had issued show cause notices to the importer, the personnel manager and the G Card holder, but not to the firm, and no enquiry for revocation had been initiated against it. In the absence of material linking the firm to the misconduct, continued suspension was not justified. The Department remained free to proceed under the licensing regulations if a later enquiry produced evidence against the firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:21:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 247 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107583</link>
      <description>Suspension of a Customs House Agent licence was held unsustainable where the alleged irregularity in clearance was attributed to an employee acting in a personal capacity, without the firm&#039;s knowledge or involvement. The Department had issued show cause notices to the importer, the personnel manager and the G Card holder, but not to the firm, and no enquiry for revocation had been initiated against it. In the absence of material linking the firm to the misconduct, continued suspension was not justified. The Department remained free to proceed under the licensing regulations if a later enquiry produced evidence against the firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>