<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 243 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107579</link>
    <description>Caps were classified as headgear under Heading 6501.80, while bags fell under Heading 6305.00 covering sacks and bags rather than clothing-accessory chapters. Small scale exemption remained available for goods bearing customers&#039; brand names where those customers did not trade in the relevant goods, because such marks were not used in the course of trade. Nike-branded clearances did not qualify for exemption, although duty relief for the brand-name element applied. The Revenue&#039;s tariff classification was sustained; exemption and related relief applied to most qualifying clearances, while duty remained payable on Nike-branded goods. Confiscation and penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:13:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 243 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107579</link>
      <description>Caps were classified as headgear under Heading 6501.80, while bags fell under Heading 6305.00 covering sacks and bags rather than clothing-accessory chapters. Small scale exemption remained available for goods bearing customers&#039; brand names where those customers did not trade in the relevant goods, because such marks were not used in the course of trade. Nike-branded clearances did not qualify for exemption, although duty relief for the brand-name element applied. The Revenue&#039;s tariff classification was sustained; exemption and related relief applied to most qualifying clearances, while duty remained payable on Nike-branded goods. Confiscation and penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>