<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 233 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107569</link>
    <description>Airport-development exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. extends to runway marking and pavement testing machines specified by function, including goods falling under any tariff chapter. A van-mounted heavy weight deflectometer and associated analysis programme used for non-destructive testing of airport runways, taxi tracks and aprons qualify as a pavement testing system, even if regarded as a special-purpose motor vehicle. Import through a non-specified port does not justify confiscation where the equipment is imported bona fide as a pavement-testing system rather than as a vehicle, supported by its functional character and prior clearance of similar equipment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:48:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 233 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107569</link>
      <description>Airport-development exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. extends to runway marking and pavement testing machines specified by function, including goods falling under any tariff chapter. A van-mounted heavy weight deflectometer and associated analysis programme used for non-destructive testing of airport runways, taxi tracks and aprons qualify as a pavement testing system, even if regarded as a special-purpose motor vehicle. Import through a non-specified port does not justify confiscation where the equipment is imported bona fide as a pavement-testing system rather than as a vehicle, supported by its functional character and prior clearance of similar equipment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>