<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 314 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107565</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the appeal, emphasizing the importance of adhering to storage requirements for imported goods and the consequences of negligence in selecting appropriate storage facilities. The judgment highlighted the significance of compliance with statutory provisions and the implications of wilful negligence in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:24:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 314 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107565</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the appeal, emphasizing the importance of adhering to storage requirements for imported goods and the consequences of negligence in selecting appropriate storage facilities. The judgment highlighted the significance of compliance with statutory provisions and the implications of wilful negligence in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>