<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 313 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107564</link>
    <description>Ceramic thread guides used in textile machinery were classified as ceramic wares for other technical uses under Heading 69.09, because the goods were made of ceramics and the HSN specifically includes thread guides for textile machinery in that heading. Section XVI Note 1(c) also excluded such articles from treatment as parts of textile machinery under Chapter 84, so the claim for Chapter 84 classification was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:21:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 313 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107564</link>
      <description>Ceramic thread guides used in textile machinery were classified as ceramic wares for other technical uses under Heading 69.09, because the goods were made of ceramics and the HSN specifically includes thread guides for textile machinery in that heading. Section XVI Note 1(c) also excluded such articles from treatment as parts of textile machinery under Chapter 84, so the claim for Chapter 84 classification was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>