https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107563 A rectification application against a CESTAT final order was held not maintainable because the order only required the adjudicating authority to decide the matter afresh in line with earlier remand directions. The Department's non-acceptance of the remand order, or its proposed challenge before a higher forum, did not create any mistake apparent on the face of the record. Until set aside by a competent higher forum, the remand directions remained binding on the adjudicating authority. As no error apparent on the record was shown, rectification was rejected. en-us Fri, 30 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:09:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107563 A rectification application against a CESTAT final order was held not maintainable because the order only required the adjudicating authority to decide the matter afresh in line with earlier remand directions. The Department's non-acceptance of the remand order, or its proposed challenge before a higher forum, did not create any mistake apparent on the face of the record. Until set aside by a competent higher forum, the remand directions remained binding on the adjudicating authority. As no error apparent on the record was shown, rectification was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 30 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107563