https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107558 Notice sent to the address on record was treated as valid service where the alleged factory closure was never intimated to the Tribunal, so the registry had no basis to use a different address. The applicant could not rely on its own omission to claim that the matter was decided without hearing. On that basis, the request to set aside the order for want of notice and hearing was rejected, and the application was dismissed. en-us Fri, 23 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:37:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107558 Notice sent to the address on record was treated as valid service where the alleged factory closure was never intimated to the Tribunal, so the registry had no basis to use a different address. The applicant could not rely on its own omission to claim that the matter was decided without hearing. On that basis, the request to set aside the order for want of notice and hearing was rejected, and the application was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 23 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107558