<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 298 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107549</link>
    <description>For central excise valuation of clearances by a 100% export oriented unit to the domestic tariff area, the article states that Rule 3 transaction value applies only where the price reflects an international sale transaction between buyer and seller. A domestic sale price does not automatically qualify as transaction value merely because it arises from a sale. The valuation basis therefore depended on whether the domestic price corresponded to, or closely approximated, the value of like imported goods; failing that, it could not be accepted as transaction value. Rule 8 remained the proper basis for valuation, and the challenge to the adopted valuation was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:19:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 298 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107549</link>
      <description>For central excise valuation of clearances by a 100% export oriented unit to the domestic tariff area, the article states that Rule 3 transaction value applies only where the price reflects an international sale transaction between buyer and seller. A domestic sale price does not automatically qualify as transaction value merely because it arises from a sale. The valuation basis therefore depended on whether the domestic price corresponded to, or closely approximated, the value of like imported goods; failing that, it could not be accepted as transaction value. Rule 8 remained the proper basis for valuation, and the challenge to the adopted valuation was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>