https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107539 Unretracted admission that semi-finished and finished excisable goods were not entered in the prescribed statutory registers established contravention of the central excise rules. On that factual basis, the authorities were justified in inferring clandestine intent to remove goods without payment of duty, and confiscation with redemption fine and penalties was upheld. The surrounding record provided sufficient legal and factual support for the finding of intentional suppression, and no basis was shown for reducing the fine or penalties. en-us Fri, 09 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:54:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107539 Unretracted admission that semi-finished and finished excisable goods were not entered in the prescribed statutory registers established contravention of the central excise rules. On that factual basis, the authorities were justified in inferring clandestine intent to remove goods without payment of duty, and confiscation with redemption fine and penalties was upheld. The surrounding record provided sufficient legal and factual support for the finding of intentional suppression, and no basis was shown for reducing the fine or penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 09 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107539