<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 279 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107530</link>
    <description>Imported consignments were found, on the invoice and accompanying literature, to be complete video games intended for use with a television receiver, not parts for manufacture. The concessional benefit under Notification No. 17/2001-Cus. applied only to parts of video games and could not extend to complete goods classifiable under sub-heading 9504.10, so the exemption was denied. A Bill of Entry describing the goods as parts, contrary to the invoice, supported a finding of mis-declaration with intent to evade duty, making the goods liable to confiscation and the importer liable to penalty. The redemption fine and penalty were reduced as excessive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:15:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 279 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107530</link>
      <description>Imported consignments were found, on the invoice and accompanying literature, to be complete video games intended for use with a television receiver, not parts for manufacture. The concessional benefit under Notification No. 17/2001-Cus. applied only to parts of video games and could not extend to complete goods classifiable under sub-heading 9504.10, so the exemption was denied. A Bill of Entry describing the goods as parts, contrary to the invoice, supported a finding of mis-declaration with intent to evade duty, making the goods liable to confiscation and the importer liable to penalty. The redemption fine and penalty were reduced as excessive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>