https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107526 The case involved appeals against the confirmation of duty demand based on disputed test results of imported goods. The lower authority denied the appellants' request for re-testing, leading to a violation of natural justice principles. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing the opportunity for re-testing in case of disputes. It concluded that denying this right amounted to a violation of procedural fairness. As a result, the order was modified to allow re-testing of samples within a specified period to validate the earlier results and determine the duty demand accordingly. en-us Thu, 01 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:06:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107526 The case involved appeals against the confirmation of duty demand based on disputed test results of imported goods. The lower authority denied the appellants' request for re-testing, leading to a violation of natural justice principles. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing the opportunity for re-testing in case of disputes. It concluded that denying this right amounted to a violation of procedural fairness. As a result, the order was modified to allow re-testing of samples within a specified period to validate the earlier results and determine the duty demand accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 01 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107526