<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 308 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107472</link>
    <description>The exemption under Notification No. 53/97-Cus. was denied for imported goods used in articles within a 100% Export Oriented Unit because the relevant coating process was held not to amount to manufacture. As no different commercial commodity came into existence, the statutory condition for availing the notification was not satisfied. The refund claim therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:26:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 308 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107472</link>
      <description>The exemption under Notification No. 53/97-Cus. was denied for imported goods used in articles within a 100% Export Oriented Unit because the relevant coating process was held not to amount to manufacture. As no different commercial commodity came into existence, the statutory condition for availing the notification was not satisfied. The refund claim therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>