<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 502 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107459</link>
    <description>Fixing high density polyethylene lining on the inner surface of pipes did not amount to manufacture because the process did not bring into existence a new and distinct commodity with a different name, character and use. Although the lining improved resistance to corrosion, abrasion and chemical action, the essential function of the goods remained transportation of liquids or gases, and their basic identity as pipes was unchanged. Mere improvement in utility or suitability is insufficient to constitute manufacture.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 502 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107459</link>
      <description>Fixing high density polyethylene lining on the inner surface of pipes did not amount to manufacture because the process did not bring into existence a new and distinct commodity with a different name, character and use. Although the lining improved resistance to corrosion, abrasion and chemical action, the essential function of the goods remained transportation of liquids or gases, and their basic identity as pipes was unchanged. Mere improvement in utility or suitability is insufficient to constitute manufacture.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>