<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 494 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUS. &amp; C. EX., MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107451</link>
    <description>The Settlement Commission ordered the applicant to pay the balance duty of Rs. 23,83,287/- and imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,00,000. Interest at the rate of 10% per annum was also imposed on the duty evaded. Immunity from prosecution was granted, but the settlement order was subject to being void if obtained by fraud or misrepresentation of facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:04:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 494 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUS. &amp; C. EX., MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107451</link>
      <description>The Settlement Commission ordered the applicant to pay the balance duty of Rs. 23,83,287/- and imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,00,000. Interest at the rate of 10% per annum was also imposed on the duty evaded. Immunity from prosecution was granted, but the settlement order was subject to being void if obtained by fraud or misrepresentation of facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>