https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107437 Delay in filing the appeal was condoned where the appellant showed bona fide belief that the appellate order could be recalled, acted promptly, and had not been informed that no review lay. The dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was also set aside because the stay petition had not been decided first. The Tribunal held that the stay application should be considered along with the merits and the appellant's financial position, and that personal hearing should be given before any fresh stay order is passed. The matter was remanded for fresh decision on the stay petition and then on the appeal. en-us Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:36:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107437 Delay in filing the appeal was condoned where the appellant showed bona fide belief that the appellate order could be recalled, acted promptly, and had not been informed that no review lay. The dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was also set aside because the stay petition had not been decided first. The Tribunal held that the stay application should be considered along with the merits and the appellant's financial position, and that personal hearing should be given before any fresh stay order is passed. The matter was remanded for fresh decision on the stay petition and then on the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107437