https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107427 Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC cannot ordinarily be used to bypass the statutory bar on a second revision under Section 397(3). Where the trial court and revisional court have already found a prima facie case for framing charge, the High Court will not ordinarily reappraise evidence or reopen concurrent findings at the charge stage. Interference is justified only in rare cases to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice. On these principles, the petition was held not maintainable as a surrogate second revision and no interference with the charge orders was made out. en-us Tue, 16 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:21:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107427 Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC cannot ordinarily be used to bypass the statutory bar on a second revision under Section 397(3). Where the trial court and revisional court have already found a prima facie case for framing charge, the High Court will not ordinarily reappraise evidence or reopen concurrent findings at the charge stage. Interference is justified only in rare cases to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice. On these principles, the petition was held not maintainable as a surrogate second revision and no interference with the charge orders was made out. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 16 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107427