<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 784 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107423</link>
    <description>Modvat credit taken on invoices issued by registered dealers could not be denied merely because the dealers were said to have sourced inputs from non-existent units. The invoices contained the required RG-23D particulars and the manufacturer&#039;s duty payment details, the consignments had crossed octroi barriers, octroi was paid, payments were made by cheque, and the manufacturer&#039;s records showed preventive checks and assessed RT-12 returns. As the Revenue did not rebut these documentary findings and relied only on the alleged source of procurement, the credit claim was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:17:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 784 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107423</link>
      <description>Modvat credit taken on invoices issued by registered dealers could not be denied merely because the dealers were said to have sourced inputs from non-existent units. The invoices contained the required RG-23D particulars and the manufacturer&#039;s duty payment details, the consignments had crossed octroi barriers, octroi was paid, payments were made by cheque, and the manufacturer&#039;s records showed preventive checks and assessed RT-12 returns. As the Revenue did not rebut these documentary findings and relied only on the alleged source of procurement, the credit claim was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>