<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 969 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107420</link>
    <description>An ex parte interim injunction restraining release of machinery from customs bond was held unsustainable because the claimant had not shown a maintainable claim for specific performance at the time of the order, and later amendment did not cure the absence of a strong prima facie case or irreparable injury. The dispute concerned movable commercial goods available in the market, with no special character shown to make monetary compensation inadequate. The court noted that an undertaking to supply similar machines if specific performance were ultimately granted further undermined the need for urgent protection. The injunction was vacated, the appeal succeeded, and the temporary injunction application was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:07:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 969 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107420</link>
      <description>An ex parte interim injunction restraining release of machinery from customs bond was held unsustainable because the claimant had not shown a maintainable claim for specific performance at the time of the order, and later amendment did not cure the absence of a strong prima facie case or irreparable injury. The dispute concerned movable commercial goods available in the market, with no special character shown to make monetary compensation inadequate. The court noted that an undertaking to supply similar machines if specific performance were ultimately granted further undermined the need for urgent protection. The injunction was vacated, the appeal succeeded, and the temporary injunction application was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>