<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 253 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107404</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving the assessment of specially denatured ethyl alcohol by a sugar mill. The appellant&#039;s method of assessing the denatured alcohol&#039;s value was deemed inaccurate as it did not consider the denaturant&#039;s cost. The Tribunal found the notice and Commissioner&#039;s order lacking material to determine the denaturant&#039;s value, ultimately setting aside the duty demand of Rs. 1.68 crore on 10,615 liters of denaturant. The Tribunal highlighted inconsistencies in the Commissioner&#039;s approach and the lack of substantial evidence to support the duty demand, leading to the appeal&#039;s success.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:15:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 253 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107404</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving the assessment of specially denatured ethyl alcohol by a sugar mill. The appellant&#039;s method of assessing the denatured alcohol&#039;s value was deemed inaccurate as it did not consider the denaturant&#039;s cost. The Tribunal found the notice and Commissioner&#039;s order lacking material to determine the denaturant&#039;s value, ultimately setting aside the duty demand of Rs. 1.68 crore on 10,615 liters of denaturant. The Tribunal highlighted inconsistencies in the Commissioner&#039;s approach and the lack of substantial evidence to support the duty demand, leading to the appeal&#039;s success.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>