<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 313 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107401</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter to the Additional Commissioner for further evaluation based on evidence presented by the appellant. The dispute centered on the interpretation of the Hand Book of Procedures 1997-2002 regarding the import of goods without a license, the classification of imported goods, the application of the Harmonised System of Nomenclature, and the determination of whether the goods qualified as second-hand goods. The tribunal found that the reliance on the Harmonised System for interpreting the Hand Book&#039;s provisions was misplaced and emphasized the broader definition of goods in the Hand Book compared to the Harmonised System.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:06:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 313 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107401</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter to the Additional Commissioner for further evaluation based on evidence presented by the appellant. The dispute centered on the interpretation of the Hand Book of Procedures 1997-2002 regarding the import of goods without a license, the classification of imported goods, the application of the Harmonised System of Nomenclature, and the determination of whether the goods qualified as second-hand goods. The tribunal found that the reliance on the Harmonised System for interpreting the Hand Book&#039;s provisions was misplaced and emphasized the broader definition of goods in the Hand Book compared to the Harmonised System.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>