<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 304 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107391</link>
    <description>Video monitors used with sinoscopes are classifiable under Heading 85.28 of the Customs Tariff rather than Heading 90.18. The tariff headings were compared using GIR 1 and GIR 3(a), and the more specific description was preferred over the more general medical-apparatus heading. Because Heading 85.28 expressly covers video monitors, their use with other equipment did not shift classification to Heading 90.18. The lower authority&#039;s order was also noted to be internally inconsistent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:40:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 304 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107391</link>
      <description>Video monitors used with sinoscopes are classifiable under Heading 85.28 of the Customs Tariff rather than Heading 90.18. The tariff headings were compared using GIR 1 and GIR 3(a), and the more specific description was preferred over the more general medical-apparatus heading. Because Heading 85.28 expressly covers video monitors, their use with other equipment did not shift classification to Heading 90.18. The lower authority&#039;s order was also noted to be internally inconsistent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>