<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 432 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107373</link>
    <description>An Assistant Commissioner was held to lack authority to issue a corrigendum on his own where the show cause notice had been made answerable to the Commissioner; the later memorandum was treated as restoring the correct position, not as a fresh notice or review. The matter also turned on whether fabricated wagon parts had emerged as distinct commercial commodities and were marketable, because those findings were necessary to determine excisability. As the impugned order did not record clear findings on marketability, the case was remanded for de novo adjudication with an opportunity to adduce evidence and be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:57:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 432 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107373</link>
      <description>An Assistant Commissioner was held to lack authority to issue a corrigendum on his own where the show cause notice had been made answerable to the Commissioner; the later memorandum was treated as restoring the correct position, not as a fresh notice or review. The matter also turned on whether fabricated wagon parts had emerged as distinct commercial commodities and were marketable, because those findings were necessary to determine excisability. As the impugned order did not record clear findings on marketability, the case was remanded for de novo adjudication with an opportunity to adduce evidence and be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>