<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 431 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107372</link>
    <description>Trade discount reflected in the supplier&#039;s invoice was held not to form part of the assessable value of imported goods where the discount was supported by the invoice and the supplier&#039;s confirmation that it was the normal trade discount extended to purchasers. The mere absence of a separately stated percentage in the invoice was insufficient to deny the discount, particularly when the record showed payment only of the invoice value and no evidence of any additional flow back to the supplier. The discount was therefore excluded from assessable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:56:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 431 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107372</link>
      <description>Trade discount reflected in the supplier&#039;s invoice was held not to form part of the assessable value of imported goods where the discount was supported by the invoice and the supplier&#039;s confirmation that it was the normal trade discount extended to purchasers. The mere absence of a separately stated percentage in the invoice was insufficient to deny the discount, particularly when the record showed payment only of the invoice value and no evidence of any additional flow back to the supplier. The discount was therefore excluded from assessable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>