<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 470 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107358</link>
    <description>Duty liability on trolleys manufactured by job workers remained with the actual manufacturer, so demand could not be fastened on the appellants for goods already covered by proceedings against the job workers. Valuation under section 4 had to proceed on wholesale price, not retail price, and the inclusion of the price of new tyres depended on verification of the actual sale practice and supporting documents. Excise-duty deduction and Modvat credit were limited to the excess-value computation after SSI exemption, while penalty under section 11AC and interest under section 11AB were unavailable for the relevant period because those provisions were not then in force; any penalty had to be reconsidered under rule 173Q after recomputation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:14:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 470 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107358</link>
      <description>Duty liability on trolleys manufactured by job workers remained with the actual manufacturer, so demand could not be fastened on the appellants for goods already covered by proceedings against the job workers. Valuation under section 4 had to proceed on wholesale price, not retail price, and the inclusion of the price of new tyres depended on verification of the actual sale practice and supporting documents. Excise-duty deduction and Modvat credit were limited to the excess-value computation after SSI exemption, while penalty under section 11AC and interest under section 11AB were unavailable for the relevant period because those provisions were not then in force; any penalty had to be reconsidered under rule 173Q after recomputation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>