<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 598 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107343</link>
    <description>Sweetened condensed milk packed in barrels was held not to fall under Chapter Heading 0401.14 because the decisive test was whether each container represented a standard unit quantity ordinarily intended for sale. The invoices showed billing on actual quantity in each barrel, and the quantity varied from barrel to barrel, so the goods were not treated as unit containers for classification purposes. The Tribunal&#039;s earlier ruling on the same issue, including the appellant&#039;s prior barrel-sale case, supported this view. The proper classification was Chapter Heading 0401.19, and the demand and penalty were not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:28:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 598 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107343</link>
      <description>Sweetened condensed milk packed in barrels was held not to fall under Chapter Heading 0401.14 because the decisive test was whether each container represented a standard unit quantity ordinarily intended for sale. The invoices showed billing on actual quantity in each barrel, and the quantity varied from barrel to barrel, so the goods were not treated as unit containers for classification purposes. The Tribunal&#039;s earlier ruling on the same issue, including the appellant&#039;s prior barrel-sale case, supported this view. The proper classification was Chapter Heading 0401.19, and the demand and penalty were not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>