<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 853 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107321</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, waiving the duty of Rs. 13.12 lakhs and the penalty imposed. The tribunal found that the scrap in question resulted from wear and tear of goods used by the applicant, not from manufacturing activity undertaken by the applicant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:58:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 853 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107321</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, waiving the duty of Rs. 13.12 lakhs and the penalty imposed. The tribunal found that the scrap in question resulted from wear and tear of goods used by the applicant, not from manufacturing activity undertaken by the applicant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>