<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 374 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107290</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the confiscation of the currency and the scooter, as well as the penalty imposed on the appellant. The judgment emphasized the importance of evidence and burden of proof in cases involving confiscation under the Customs Act, highlighting the need for corroborative evidence to support allegations of smuggling and sale proceeds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:39:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 374 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107290</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the confiscation of the currency and the scooter, as well as the penalty imposed on the appellant. The judgment emphasized the importance of evidence and burden of proof in cases involving confiscation under the Customs Act, highlighting the need for corroborative evidence to support allegations of smuggling and sale proceeds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>