<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 257 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107270</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied the small-scale exemption to the appellant for the specified period based on the interpretation of relevant notifications and legal principles. The case was referred for further review to ensure consistency and clarity in legal interpretation, following a disagreement with a Larger Bench&#039;s decision regarding retrospective application of exemption notifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:58:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 257 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107270</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied the small-scale exemption to the appellant for the specified period based on the interpretation of relevant notifications and legal principles. The case was referred for further review to ensure consistency and clarity in legal interpretation, following a disagreement with a Larger Bench&#039;s decision regarding retrospective application of exemption notifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>