<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 446 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107261</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, determining that the disputed period falls under the exemption provided by Notification No. 67/95-C.E., dated 16-3-95. As a result, the appellants were granted the benefit of exemption, leading to the allowance of the appeal. Other issues raised by both parties were deemed unnecessary to address in light of this outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:34:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 446 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107261</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, determining that the disputed period falls under the exemption provided by Notification No. 67/95-C.E., dated 16-3-95. As a result, the appellants were granted the benefit of exemption, leading to the allowance of the appeal. Other issues raised by both parties were deemed unnecessary to address in light of this outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>