<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 555 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107238</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the duty demands on imported drawings and designs, classifying them as subject to customs duty. Despite the appellant&#039;s deposit for duty payment, the tribunal rejected their pleas and confirmed the duty amounts assessed. The penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act was set aside as the imports predated the section&#039;s promulgation. The impugned order was modified in line with the tribunal&#039;s decision, resulting in the disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:50:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 555 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107238</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the duty demands on imported drawings and designs, classifying them as subject to customs duty. Despite the appellant&#039;s deposit for duty payment, the tribunal rejected their pleas and confirmed the duty amounts assessed. The penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act was set aside as the imports predated the section&#039;s promulgation. The impugned order was modified in line with the tribunal&#039;s decision, resulting in the disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>