<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 619 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107226</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 112, finding the appellant involved in tampering with bills of entry to evade interest payment. It confirmed the violation of clause (j) of Section 111 regarding goods removal without proper permission. The matter of interest payment was remanded for clarification on the exact amount paid by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:54:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 619 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107226</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 112, finding the appellant involved in tampering with bills of entry to evade interest payment. It confirmed the violation of clause (j) of Section 111 regarding goods removal without proper permission. The matter of interest payment was remanded for clarification on the exact amount paid by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>