<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 616 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107223</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the enhancement of the declared value for eight items of crystal glassware imported by M/s. New Janata Traders for assessment of Customs duty. The Tribunal found that the burden of proof was not shifted to the Appellants and supported the Department&#039;s evidence of mis-declaration. While penalties and confiscation were upheld, they were reduced as deemed excessive, resulting in modified penalties upon disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:25:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 616 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107223</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the enhancement of the declared value for eight items of crystal glassware imported by M/s. New Janata Traders for assessment of Customs duty. The Tribunal found that the burden of proof was not shifted to the Appellants and supported the Department&#039;s evidence of mis-declaration. While penalties and confiscation were upheld, they were reduced as deemed excessive, resulting in modified penalties upon disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>