https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107208 The Tribunal found that the final order had not been enclosed with the covering letter, so the appellant had not been properly served with the dismissal order. On that factual basis, the delay objection was not treated as a bar to restoration, and the earlier dismissal was recalled. The appeal was restored to its original number. en-us Tue, 04 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:38:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107208 The Tribunal found that the final order had not been enclosed with the covering letter, so the appellant had not been properly served with the dismissal order. On that factual basis, the delay objection was not treated as a bar to restoration, and the earlier dismissal was recalled. The appeal was restored to its original number. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 04 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107208