https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107204 Coercive recovery and attachment should not be pursued once a Tribunal has orally allowed a stay petition and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication. The text states that, after the departmental authorities were informed of the open-court order, recovery proceedings ought not to have continued by coercive measures. It also reflects the settled principle that coercive recovery should not be initiated while a stay petition is pending before a higher forum. The authorities were directed not to commence any coercive action against the appellant. en-us Thu, 21 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:26:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107204 Coercive recovery and attachment should not be pursued once a Tribunal has orally allowed a stay petition and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication. The text states that, after the departmental authorities were informed of the open-court order, recovery proceedings ought not to have continued by coercive measures. It also reflects the settled principle that coercive recovery should not be initiated while a stay petition is pending before a higher forum. The authorities were directed not to commence any coercive action against the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107204