<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 430 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107171</link>
    <description>Glass bottles imported as essential packing material for a manufacturer&#039;s perfume business were not consumer goods, because they were suited to the appellant&#039;s own product and not capable of meaningful public consumption within the import policy sense. On those facts, the lower authority&#039;s classification was unsustainable, and the confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:10:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 430 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107171</link>
      <description>Glass bottles imported as essential packing material for a manufacturer&#039;s perfume business were not consumer goods, because they were suited to the appellant&#039;s own product and not capable of meaningful public consumption within the import policy sense. On those facts, the lower authority&#039;s classification was unsustainable, and the confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>