<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 418 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107159</link>
    <description>Separately duty-paid broken PCC poles cleared independently could not be loaded again into the assessable value of the finished good poles, because the broken poles had already suffered duty on their own clearance. The cost of manufacture also had to be computed using the actual interest cost for the relevant period, rather than substituting an earlier figure. On both issues, the computation adopted by the assessee was accepted and the contrary adjustment was disallowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:42:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 418 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107159</link>
      <description>Separately duty-paid broken PCC poles cleared independently could not be loaded again into the assessable value of the finished good poles, because the broken poles had already suffered duty on their own clearance. The cost of manufacture also had to be computed using the actual interest cost for the relevant period, rather than substituting an earlier figure. On both issues, the computation adopted by the assessee was accepted and the contrary adjustment was disallowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>