<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 415 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107156</link>
    <description>The Commissioner upheld the classification of Popular Tea Mixture (PTM) and Premium Tea Recipe (PTR) under a different heading than argued by the appellants, citing relevant case law. The jurisdictional issue regarding the Commissioner&#039;s authority in Mumbai was raised, challenging the show cause notices&#039; validity. After hearings, a reduced duty amount was confirmed for a limited period without imposing penalties. The appellants contested the demand, emphasizing procedural irregularities and incorrect duty calculations. Legal precedents from previous cases were crucial in challenging the demand raised through the show cause notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:30:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 415 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107156</link>
      <description>The Commissioner upheld the classification of Popular Tea Mixture (PTM) and Premium Tea Recipe (PTR) under a different heading than argued by the appellants, citing relevant case law. The jurisdictional issue regarding the Commissioner&#039;s authority in Mumbai was raised, challenging the show cause notices&#039; validity. After hearings, a reduced duty amount was confirmed for a limited period without imposing penalties. The appellants contested the demand, emphasizing procedural irregularities and incorrect duty calculations. Legal precedents from previous cases were crucial in challenging the demand raised through the show cause notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>