<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 521 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107153</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the duty demand and personal penalty imposed. The additional testing charges recovered by the appellant were deemed unrelated to manufacturing activities and not to be included in the assessable value of goods. The recoveries for independent testing, distinct from standard manufacturing processes, were found not to impact the goods&#039; value. The Tribunal granted relief to the appellants, concluding that the demand based on these charges was erroneous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:26:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 521 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107153</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the duty demand and personal penalty imposed. The additional testing charges recovered by the appellant were deemed unrelated to manufacturing activities and not to be included in the assessable value of goods. The recoveries for independent testing, distinct from standard manufacturing processes, were found not to impact the goods&#039; value. The Tribunal granted relief to the appellants, concluding that the demand based on these charges was erroneous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>