https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107139 The appeals were allowed primarily on the grounds of insufficient notice and due process concerning the imposition of penalties on the companies, directors, and employees involved in the case of clandestine removal of goods. The Tribunal found that the penalties exceeded the scope of the show cause notice, leading to the orders imposing penalties on them being deemed invalid. Additionally, the excise clerk was also granted relief as he was not provided with a fair opportunity to defend himself due to the lack of specific allegations in the show cause notice. en-us Fri, 27 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:22:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107139 The appeals were allowed primarily on the grounds of insufficient notice and due process concerning the imposition of penalties on the companies, directors, and employees involved in the case of clandestine removal of goods. The Tribunal found that the penalties exceeded the scope of the show cause notice, leading to the orders imposing penalties on them being deemed invalid. Additionally, the excise clerk was also granted relief as he was not provided with a fair opportunity to defend himself due to the lack of specific allegations in the show cause notice. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 27 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107139