<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 500 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107110</link>
    <description>Penalty was held unsustainable where the Tribunal noted conflicting earlier views on whether assembling units of a data processing system amounted to manufacture, and it declined to decide that issue. The Tribunal further observed that penalty could not be imposed simultaneously on a partnership firm and its partners. On that basis, the penalties imposed on the appellants were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:58:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 500 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107110</link>
      <description>Penalty was held unsustainable where the Tribunal noted conflicting earlier views on whether assembling units of a data processing system amounted to manufacture, and it declined to decide that issue. The Tribunal further observed that penalty could not be imposed simultaneously on a partnership firm and its partners. On that basis, the penalties imposed on the appellants were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>