<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 843 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107075</link>
    <description>During the pendency of the stay petition, and after the Tribunal had granted stay and remanded the matter, coercive recovery action was held impermissible against the assessee. The Tribunal directed the authorities not to initiate any coercive recovery measures while the stay protection remained in force, preserving the assessee&#039;s relief pending further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 14:34:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 843 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107075</link>
      <description>During the pendency of the stay petition, and after the Tribunal had granted stay and remanded the matter, coercive recovery action was held impermissible against the assessee. The Tribunal directed the authorities not to initiate any coercive recovery measures while the stay protection remained in force, preserving the assessee&#039;s relief pending further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>