<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 331 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107057</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the Licensing Assistant, finding his actions compliant with superiors&#039; instructions. The appellant&#039;s limited role did not involve decision-making on license contents, absolving him of guilt under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act due to lack of mens rea. The tribunal concluded no malicious intent or benefit to the appellant, allowing the appeal and granting consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:45:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 331 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107057</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the Licensing Assistant, finding his actions compliant with superiors&#039; instructions. The appellant&#039;s limited role did not involve decision-making on license contents, absolving him of guilt under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act due to lack of mens rea. The tribunal concluded no malicious intent or benefit to the appellant, allowing the appeal and granting consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>