<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1233 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107054</link>
    <description>The appellate authority allowed the appeal in the case of M/s. Dinesh &amp;amp; Co., Ranipet, emphasizing that Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 does not apply to deposits made during investigations. The authority ruled that the time limit for refund claims under Section 11B was inapplicable due to the nature of the deposit made during the investigation, distinguishing it from duty payments. The authority directed the lower authority to refund the deposit amount, highlighting that such deposits are refundable and should not be denied post-investigation, advocating for a fair resolution without unnecessary tax battles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:31:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1233 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107054</link>
      <description>The appellate authority allowed the appeal in the case of M/s. Dinesh &amp;amp; Co., Ranipet, emphasizing that Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 does not apply to deposits made during investigations. The authority ruled that the time limit for refund claims under Section 11B was inapplicable due to the nature of the deposit made during the investigation, distinguishing it from duty payments. The authority directed the lower authority to refund the deposit amount, highlighting that such deposits are refundable and should not be denied post-investigation, advocating for a fair resolution without unnecessary tax battles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>